MUM Experimental Results |
|
We have thoroughly tested and evaluated the performance of the MUM handoff management by deploying MUM streaming applications in our campus wireless network. Our testbed consists of several Windows and Linux client laptops equipped with four different wireless cards: i) in-ternal Intel PRO/Wireless 3945AGB, ii) Orinoco Gold Wi-Fi cards, iii) internal ASUS BT card, and iv) Mopogo BT dongles. MUM service gateways execute on standard Linux boxes with 1.8 GHz processors and 1024MB RAM.
During experiments, clients have moved between BT and Wi-Fi cells served respectively by Mopogo BT dongles and Cisco Aironet 1100 APs, by chang-ing various MUM WI domains corresponding to different buildings. All RSSI and handoff traces collected during our on-the-field experiments are available here. The following experimental results have been obtained while provisioning a video surveillance service consist-ing of a H263-encoded VoD flow (frame size = 176x144 pixels, constant frame rate = 8 frames/s) with buffer slots storing H263 RTP packets (667B per packet on the average).
Preliminary Results
Vertical Handoff Times To initially assess the performance of the system, we evaluated main components that affect vertical handoff durations; in particular, we were interested to see how network coverage influenced handoff duration. Each measured time were evaluated on a set of 40 measures and we report mean value and standard deviation; each time is reported in seconds. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1: Vertical Handoff Times |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We are currently updating this page. More details will be available soon!!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-feb-10 |